Ann Patchett's The Dutch House is a modern fairy tale in five acts, tracing Danny and Maeve Conroy across five decades, forward and backward, always circling back to the mansion outside Philadelphia their father bought on impulse and their stepmother later stole from them. It is, at bottom, a story about how a single physical address can absorb an entire family's journey.
I was personally vested in the notion of the house as a central artifact. I grew up in Philadelphia in the mid 1980s. I went to Drexel and Wharton, and had my first two jobs in that same Philly orbit that includes Main Line that Patchett is writing about. There is also a real estate agent's often cited theory I have heard: that people unconsciously model their first home on wherever they were happiest as children, usually a grandparent's house. My own grandfather occupied the third floor of his house and had his coffee sent up by a pulley basket, and I occupy the third floor of mine now, minus the pulley, for reasons that belong to this century and not that one.
The story's narrator, Danny, is the son and who is by design passive and often oblivious to what is happening in his own house. His sister Maeve, sacrifices the ambitious future her Barnard degree pointed toward, and takes a modest job near the Dutch House instead, purely so she can keep watch over both the house and her brother. She engineers the draining of an education trust as her one available act of revenge against her stepmother, Andrea, funneling Danny through the most expensive schools she can find. What's striking is how long and how completely she carries that particular anger, compared to the far more complicated, far less settled feeling she has for the mother who actually started all of this by leaving.
Patchett never quite lets you forget that the easier target and the deeper wound are not the same person, and watching the sister character, Maeve manage that gap is more rewarding than anything the plot does with the house itself.
Andrea the stepmom herself is drawn somewhat thinly. Patchett gives her almost no interiority to explain the coldness, which makes her satisfying to despise but a little too convenient as a villain. Elna the mother is the more interesting failure of parenting, if only because the book seems more willing to understand her than to judge her. She leaves her children with no provision at all, choosing strangers over her own family, and the book never quite decides whether that is a kind of grace or a kind of cowardice. Maeve says it herself, more or less shouting it: men leave their children all the time and the world celebrates them for it. Patchett clearly knows the double standard she's working with, though whether the book fully resolves it is something worth arguing about at the meeting rather than settling here.
Without giving too much away, the house does change hands again before the story ends, and getting there costs more than money. The way Patchett arranges who is and is not present for that final turn is one of the more affecting choices in the book. It lands harder than you might expect, and I will leave it there for those who haven't read it yet.
Patchett's structure of the book moves it like a house tour. You are led room to room, forward in time and then back, until the whole floor plan comes into view. You realize you have been standing in the same building the entire time without knowing it. It's a demanding structure for a book with no explosions, no big set pieces, just a family relearning how to be in the same room. And Tom Hanks's audiobook narration, that I was surprised to discover, was genuinely transporting rather than slow (duh, of course!)
When Patchett is writing about what a house does to the people who love it, she has few equals. You can take the Conroys out of the Dutch House, but you can't take the Dutch House out of the Conroys.
No comments:
Post a Comment